
I've been reading Dr. Henry's response to the ad in the Greeneville Sun by the alumni players and Coach C's subsequent response. I was thinking about this whole thing and then... Poof! It hit me square in the face. So, if you don't mind, I'd like to take you on a little journey. Please feel free to leave your comments to this article if you feel I am off base here. Ready to go?
When all of this starting to come about, I distinctly remember Dr. Henry stating that this incident has brought great shame to our school. Do you remember that? Yeah, you probably read it in the press release too. It reminds me of an old saying, 'You don't always know when you're being lied to, but you always know when you hear the truth'.
Let's examine these two almost identical incidents:
#1 The incident in 2004 (a completely different group of thieves) that involved the theft of somewhere around $17,000 was not handled properly by either BCG (Boston Culinary Group), the concession vendor or Tusculum was it? Whether that group in 2004 decided to return the money or not is irrelevant. Charges should have been filed, period. But they decided against it? Why? I mean, clearly BCG did not think it was a big issue because they had the authority to file felony charges and send a clear message to all schools that this better not happen. My personal opinion is that it was business as usual. Probably some real nice people at BCG and they probably said "Hey guys, just return the money... no harm, no foul." Of course, they got the money back. So, why didn't Tusculum expel those students in 2004? Well, I have a theory. They decided to sweep it all under the rug and not bring any outside attention to this untidy little mess. I mean, why bring any attention at all to it, right? In fact, it could hurt their image if something like this got out. Plus, it would most likely hurt the donations to the college. Let's not rattle the piggy bank. If you can clean up your back yard without anyone knowing about it, why not? Well, that's exactly what they did. The smart thing at that point would have been to create a framework of consequences for future actions should something like this happen again (See the blog below this one). But they didn't do that. Instead, because of personal reasons, Dr. Henry and Ed Hoffmeyer decided to keep that Ace in the coat pocket to use later. Sort of an insurance policy. I know, you're probably thinking I'm off my rocker (no pun intended Jason), but this is how we play the game of politics.
#2 The incident in 2006 again was a crime of grand theft. Again, BCG (good guys) decide not to press charges. Shame on you BCG, but we understand how business works. It's all about the money. Get it back, so why waste your time filing charges, getting involved in an investigation, being subpoenaed by prosecutors, testifying at trial (if there was one) and the bad publicity that you people aren't doing your job to secure the money? My understanding is that the cash is stuffed into drawers. Ever heard of a cash register and receipts? How about a supervisor to oversee the students? Nevertheless, still... shame on you. You're part of the problem too. Now let's look at what Tusculum does. This time, they fire the coaches because... you guessed it. It's brought great shame to the school. (Here's where it gets good, so fasten your seat belts.) Dr. Henry and Ed Hoffmeyer, maybe you can clarify this for me because I'm still confused.
If no one knew about the 2004 incident and BCG wasn't willing to press charges in 2006, who would have known about anything if you hadn't done your press release? Exactly... no one. So, truthfully, you're trying to pull one over on us. It's okay to admit it, we can all see it. This incident could have been swept under the rug like 2004. Is it right to sweep something like this under the rug? Personally, I don't think it should be done regardless. But clearly Tusculum justified in 2004, so why not in 2006? What changed it for 2006 if no one would have know except for the same groups of people as in 2004. I mean, I never heard about the 2004 incident until Dr. Henry mentioned it. Did you? Clearly BCG wasn't going to say anything. I'm sure the coaches or the players weren't going to say anything. But, guess who does say something. If no one was going to talk about it, no one would know. If no one would know, how can it bring great shame to the school? I'll give you my two cents worth... Because of personal and philosophical differences with Coach C, Dr. Henry and Ed Hoffmeyer decide to use that Ace from 2004 and play it now, thus getting C out. Then, they probably told C that if there were any problems(because of them firing him) that they'd play that Ace to tarnish his reputation. Does this sound crazy to you? Or, does it sound likely? Look at the events and how they've played out. It seems pretty clear to me.
Also, I wanted to bring your attention to the ironic. If you look at the Greeneville Sun paper the day the article by Dr. Henry and Coach C came out, you'll notice the story of the Tusculum football player who got it trouble, but got a second chance and he's learned his lesson... blah, blah, blah. Funny how he messed up and was punished individually. I didn't see the football season canceled or the coaches fired. As a matter of fact, you've welcomed him back with open arms. Tusculum, are there double standards here or am I dreaming?
In closing, I want to clarify one more thing. Coach C is not simply a coach, he's an educator. He's given so much to so many people for almost 20 years at Tusculum that our references to him should denote his true role. He's help mold us in many ways. He's taught us to never give up, to believe in ourselves individually and collectively as a team. He's encouraged us and he's challenged us. He's given us the possibility that we can transcend our mental limitations. That those are limits we impose upon ourselves. Coach C is the type of educator that comes around vary rarely. And Coach, if you're reading this, we're still going to keep playing for you no matter what they try to throw... mud and all.
Here is a link to the article in the Greeneville Sun:
http://www.greene.xtn.net/index.php?table=news&template=news.view.subscriber&newsid=133719